See for yourself on today's edition of Democracy Now. Sunstein is smart enough to do "lawyer talk" in an exchange with Glenn Greenwald, in which he snidely suggests that when Greenwald expresses indignation about the FISA sellout and Bush Administration authorized torture, he's being "emotional."
I stopped watching after Sunstein started talking about his new book, Nudge, which, I gather, has as its thesis that people are stupid so it's up the government to educate them and then maybe they will or won't decide to do something about stuff, or something. What crap.
So if anyone feels that they missed out going to Chicago, where he taught, or to Harvard, where he has a new job, don't give it a thought. They have hired a man who is capable of going before the public and saying things such as, "Crimes are Against the Law." Greenwald is a strong contrast to him: a man who has core convictions and stands by them and never, ever talks down to anyone.
Sunstein is every bit as bad as I intuited he was before I saw his dismal performance here. He's an opportunist with no convictions except the convenient ones, a real academic slimeball.
Guess I can't say I like him.
More: Sunstein's crack about how he's "emotional" is to draw attention to the fact that Greenwald is openly gay and therefore irrational, like a woman, you know.
Update: Olberman does his job. I hear echoes of Cold War liberalism here in Sunstein's moral relativism. Cold War liberalism had at its base the idea that the U.S. was a great country but not always a good one, but that the end of American hegemony could justify any actions the government took. This is a dangerous road to go down. It's the one that got us into Vietnam, an entanglement that began in the Kennedy Administration. And what are the goals now? Defeating "terrorism" and defending "The Market?" This is not a noble enterprise. It took a lot of propaganda to get the American public behind the Cold War, and I hope Americans can resist this neo-liberal push from Obama's advisors.
More: Here is some of that Obama magic, from Mike Whitney in Counterpunch:
Obama is not an antiwar candidate, that is merely a fiction maintained by his public relations team. In fact, he wants to beef up the military with 65,000 additional ground forces and 27,000 more marines. He's also stated that he will add “two additional combat brigades to Afghanistan” and encourage NATO to make “greater contributions—with fewer restrictions”. In his op-ed he boasted, "As president, I will make the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban the top priority that it should be. This is a war that we have to win.”
He also added this ominous warning:
“The greatest threat to that security lies in the tribal regions of Pakistan, where terrorists train and insurgents strike into Afghanistan. We cannot tolerate a terrorist sanctuary, and as president, I won’t. We need a stronger and sustained partnership between Afghanistan, Pakistan and NATO to secure the border, to take out terrorist camps and to crack down on cross-border insurgents. We need more troops, more helicopters, more satellites, more Predator drones in the Afghan border region. And we must make it clear that if Pakistan cannot or will not act, we will take out high-level terrorist targets like bin Laden if we have them in our sights.”