How shameful. No matter how much they smile and act like they care, they don't care about women at all.
Comments
It seems the issue is native Americans, LBGTs and immmigrants. If they would make a legal argument for this it might give us a chance to let them know how attorneys can get around it rather than throwing all of the women under the bus in their idiology.
Hello Hattie, I came over from Rainy Day Thoughts. I like your blog and I love Hawaii. My sister in law is from Hilo. But, I lean conservative so I have to ask a question. I am curious did you post a similar article last year when this bill was introduced by a Republican woman in Congress as HR4970? It passed with 216 Republican votes and 6 Democrat votes and 182 Democrats voted against it. The bill then died in the Democratically controlled Senate. I would post the names of all the Dems that are for Violence against women but it would take too much space.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michelle-m-ortiz/violence-against-women-act-hr-4970_b_1477989.html
Of course I know a lot of people don't believe same sex partners, immigrants and Native Americans deserve protection against domestic violence, but I happen to think it's a good idea.
I think you are being misinformed.
And this http://umsapac.blogspot.com/2012/05/violence-against-women-act.html
I am willing to concede that not all of these men believe in violence against women. It would be more accurate to say that they don't care about women as a class and are indifferent to the fate of women who are not of use to them or who (even worse) oppose them.
I agree that all the groups that you included should be equally protected as should men and children be protected from violent women. I read the comments on the Huff post article and it seems both sides have decent arguments on last years bill.
I don't put a lot of stock in what Rachel Maddow says. I would trust her reporting about as much as I trust Rush Limbaugh's.
It seems the issue is native Americans, LBGTs and immmigrants. If they would make a legal argument for this it might give us a chance to let them know how attorneys can get around it rather than throwing all of the women under the bus in their idiology.
Posted by: Tabor | February 13, 2013 at 04:46 AM
Tabor: I am not sure what you mean here.
Posted by: Hattie | February 13, 2013 at 07:56 AM
Great minds think alike!!! I posted this at my blog, too along with their names!!!!
Posted by: Kay Dennison | February 13, 2013 at 08:58 AM
Hello Hattie, I came over from Rainy Day Thoughts. I like your blog and I love Hawaii. My sister in law is from Hilo. But, I lean conservative so I have to ask a question. I am curious did you post a similar article last year when this bill was introduced by a Republican woman in Congress as HR4970? It passed with 216 Republican votes and 6 Democrat votes and 182 Democrats voted against it. The bill then died in the Democratically controlled Senate. I would post the names of all the Dems that are for Violence against women but it would take too much space.
Posted by: Ingineer66 | February 15, 2013 at 04:53 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michelle-m-ortiz/violence-against-women-act-hr-4970_b_1477989.html
Of course I know a lot of people don't believe same sex partners, immigrants and Native Americans deserve protection against domestic violence, but I happen to think it's a good idea.
I think you are being misinformed.
And this
http://umsapac.blogspot.com/2012/05/violence-against-women-act.html
I am willing to concede that not all of these men believe in violence against women. It would be more accurate to say that they don't care about women as a class and are indifferent to the fate of women who are not of use to them or who (even worse) oppose them.
Posted by: Hattie | February 15, 2013 at 08:01 PM
I agree that all the groups that you included should be equally protected as should men and children be protected from violent women. I read the comments on the Huff post article and it seems both sides have decent arguments on last years bill.
I don't put a lot of stock in what Rachel Maddow says. I would trust her reporting about as much as I trust Rush Limbaugh's.
Posted by: Ingineer66 | February 16, 2013 at 09:48 AM
That is the false equivalence argument. Purest sophistry.
Posted by: Hattie | February 16, 2013 at 09:54 AM